Market Sizing

Building Your Total Addressable Market (TAM) with NAICS Data

Step-by-step guide to Total Addressable Market (TAM) using NAICS data. Learn how to accurately size markets for investors—no downloads required.


Building Your Total Addressable Market (TAM) with NAICS Data

A practical, no-download guide to accurately sizing markets the investor-approved way—straight from public NAICS sources.


1. Pick Your Addressable Unit

Your “unit” can be firms, locations, transactions, or end-users. Choose the level you can count with verifiable data. For most B2B scenarios, precise six-digit NAICS codes are the ideal anchor.

2. Find Verifiable Unit Counts

  • County Business Patterns (CBP) – detailed firm counts segmented by NAICS, geography, and size
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) QCEW – quarterly establishment counts, employment, and wage data
  • SEC 10‑K Filings – publicly disclosed competitor data to cross-validate unit assumptions

Example: NAICS 236220 (Commercial Contractors) has 48,127 firms according to CBP data; NAICS 238910 (Site Preparation Contractors) adds another 10,998.

3. Attach Pricing or ARPU

TAM = Units × Price × 12 months

If you sell by seat or user, use Average Revenue Per User (ARPU); if you sell per firm, use your average contract value. Always model at least two price points (e.g., standard and discounted) to assess sensitivity and market elasticity.

4. Crunch TAM → SAM → SOM

  1. Total Addressable Market (TAM): Start broadly: Units × Price × 12 months
  2. Serviceable Available Market (SAM): Refine by realistic criteria (geography, size, segment fit). Example: West Coast firms represent 42%; mid-market firms represent 78% of those.
  3. Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM): Apply your attainable market share over a defined timeline (e.g., realistically capturing 5% market share within three years).

Tip: Investors value conservative, clearly-explained assumptions—use actual industry benchmarks wherever possible.

5. Stress-Test Assumptions

Investors love realistic stress-testing. Show robustness by evaluating:

  • Geographic variability: Compare nationwide versus targeted regional market sizing.
  • Price sensitivity: Simulate pricing pressure scenarios (e.g., 20% lower pricing).
  • Market share sensitivity: Model conservative (3%) versus optimistic (8%) market share scenarios.
  • Competitive responses: Assume varying competitive intensity and how it affects market penetration.

6. Package the Story

  1. Problem statement: Clearly define the pain point, e.g., "59,000 contractors lack efficient site management solutions."
  2. TAM headline: Frame the market size compellingly: "That's a $2.5 billion annual market opportunity."
  3. Why now: Emphasize market triggers—like regulatory shifts, technological advancements, or evolving customer expectations.
  4. Your strategy and plan: Define your achievable market capture clearly, e.g., "Achieving a 5% market share translates into a $98 million revenue opportunity (SOM), with a clear path to $5M Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) in 18 months."

Frequently Asked Questions

Is bottom-up sizing always better than top-down?

Bottom-up analysis uses verifiable data points, making it more credible. However, cross-checking with top-down approaches can strengthen your overall market analysis.

How many NAICS digits should I show investors?

Use full six-digit NAICS codes whenever available for maximum precision. Roll-up broader categories only if specific data is unavailable or insufficient.

What if my business spans multiple NAICS codes?

Clearly allocate revenue or activities across multiple codes and weight them accordingly to reflect accurate market sizing.

Similar posts

Get notified on new marketing insights

Be the first to know about new B2B SaaS Marketing insights to build or refine your marketing function with the tools and knowledge of today’s industry.