Market Sizing

Market Sizing Methods: Top-Down vs Bottom-Up Analysis for Founders

Compare top-down and bottom-up approaches to market sizing—learn when to use each method and how they complement your TAM, SAM & SOM analyses.


When it comes to sizing your market, two approaches dominate: top-down—starting from broad industry figures—and bottom-up—building from customer-level data. Each has unique strengths, and using them together ensures both speed and precision in your TAM, SAM & SOM analyses.

Top-Down Approach: The Bird’s-Eye View

The top-down method leverages published industry reports and macroeconomic data. You begin with a large pool—like total software spending—then apply filters (geography, segment, user type) to zero in on your target. This approach delivers a rapid, high-level estimate:

  • Quick insights: Great for early validation or benchmarking against competitors.
  • Data sources: Industry analyst reports, government statistics, public filings.
  • Watch out for: Overly broad assumptions that may mask niche opportunities.

Bottom-Up Approach: The Ground-Level Build

Bottom-up sizing starts with concrete data points—number of potential customers or units sold—multiplied by your average revenue per unit. It’s inherently more granular:

  • Investor-ready: Builds a defensible model using tangible inputs.
  • Customization: Tailor assumptions by segment, channel or pricing tier.
  • Time investment: Requires detailed data gathering and validation.

When & Why to Combine Them

Rather than choosing one over the other, cross-verify bottom-up results against your top-down benchmarks. Discrepancies often highlight blind spots—missing segments, outdated data, or pricing misalignments. In practice:

  1. Run a bottom-up model in our Market Opportunity Simulator.
  2. Compare to industry totals via top-down reports.
  3. Adjust assumptions until both methods converge on a realistic range.

Practical Example: SaaS Startup

Imagine a SaaS company targeting mid-market CRM users:

  1. Top-down: $100 B global CRM spend × 10% mid-market share → $10 B TAM.
  2. Bottom-up: 200,000 target companies × $2K average contract → $400 M TAM.
  3. Reconcile: Investigate the $9.6 B gap to refine your segment definition.

From TAM to SAM & SOM

Once TAM is set, filter for what you can actually serve (SAM) and what you can capture quickly (SOM).

Ready to Model Your Market?

Automate both approaches with Olympus Intel—generate custom reports and export investor-ready PDFs in minutes:

Start Modeling for $79

You may also like:

Similar posts

Get notified on new marketing insights

Be the first to know about new B2B SaaS Marketing insights to build or refine your marketing function with the tools and knowledge of today’s industry.